Understanding UDFI Tax Impact in Multi-Family Real Estate Syndications: Part 1

This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Multi-family real estate syndications have been one of the hottest asset classes for savvy IRA investors for the last several years.

Participating as a limited partner in a professionally-run real estate project that is larger in scale provides many benefits. For busy professionals looking to put retirement money to work in a hands-off manner that provides a good mix of principal security and solid return potential, real estate syndications are hard to beat.

Most of these deals use a combination of investor capital and mortgage debt to acquire properties. This use of debt-financing produces exposure to tax on Unrelated Debt Financed Income (UDFI) for an IRA investor.

Queue the panic button!
Taxes will kill your IRA return!
The sky is falling!

Wrong, wrong, and, um…wrong.

Many investors and even a lot of syndicate general partners approach the topic of UDFI taxation with fear. That fear is misplaced and largely based on lack of good information.
We wanted to take a little bit of time to put this topic in proper perspective.

What is UDFI?

When an IRA uses debt-financing, it brings non-IRA money into the picture to increase the performance of the IRA’s investment. Section 514 of the tax code designates a tax on this Unrelated Debt-Financed Income.

Such taxation first became applicable in 1969, and is a means to prevent certain types of abusive transactions via tax-exempt structures.

UDFI is the portion of the income that an IRA receives based on the use of the borrowed funds. In a property with a 65% LTV loan, that would mean 65% of the gross income produced by the property is considered UDFI.

The IRA can apply the same 65% ratio of normal deductions such as depreciation, interest on the note, and operating expenses to offset the taxable income. The net taxable amount left after deductions is used to determine the tax owed by the IRA.

Taxation on UDFI applies to rental income produced by a debt-financed property. The gain on sale of a property that still has debt-financing in place is also considered to be UDFI and taxable.

At the end of the day, the IRA pays what is usually a nominal amount of tax in order to benefit from the higher cash-on-cash returns that leverage produces. The benefits of leverage will still very much be realized, just with a small amount of friction.

So, if generating higher net returns for your IRA is of interest, read on.

The Solo 401(k) Exemption

As a qualified employer retirement plan, a Solo 401(k) is exempted from UDFI when the debt-financing is used for the acquisition of real property. Other types of debt-financing, such as leveraged stock trading, are taxable as UDFI in a Solo 401(k).

In most syndicated real estate partnerships where income and losses are attributed to all limited partners equally, this exemption will still apply — even though the real estate is indirectly held and financed.

A Solo 401(k) could lose UDFI exemption if the partnership is shifting depreciation solely to investors using non-retirement funds. Such unequal allocation of losses violates the “fractions rule” of IRC section 514(c)(9)(E), and voids the qualified plan exemption to UDFI.

For those investors who are eligible for a Solo 401(k), that platform provides an advantage in terms of simplicity and higher profitability when investing in leveraged multi-family syndications.

A Sample Multi-Family Syndication

Let’s examine how UDFI impacts an IRA investor in a typical multi-family syndication.

In this project, the promoter is acquiring a 216-unit apartment complex for $25M using $10M down and a loan in the amount of $16.25M. The total acquisition cost will be $26.25M, allowing for transactional costs and capital improvements to the property.

Limited partner investors will provide $9M, and the general partner will have skin in the game by providing $1M.

The project plan is to upgrade the property and management to increase rents and occupancy rates, thereby improving the performance of the apartment. After a 10-year hold, the property will be sold, with a projected value of about $34.5M.

An IRA investor bringing $100K to this project will have a 1% equity stake as a limited partner in the LLC that will hold and operate the property.

When the investor is looking at their income and applicable taxation, everything is fractionalized to their IRA’s 1% level of ownership. So instead of this being a $25M project with $10M of investor capital down, it essentially becomes a $250K project with the IRA investor’s $100K down.

The promoter’s pro-forma projections for cash flow indicate that a 1% limited partner can expect a distribution from the LLC annually. The following amounts exhibit the increase over time as property performance increases.

  • Year 1: $7,119
  • Year 5: $10,769
  • Year 10 $11,395

At the end of the 10-year hold when the property sells, the investor should receive their capital back, plus their percentage of the gain on sale. Our $100K investor with 1% participation could expect around $92K in proceeds from the future sale if the $34.5M goal is met.

UDFI Calculation

When examining UDFI, there are 3 key values used:

1. Average Acquisition Indebtedness

This is the average monthly balance on the loan during that portion of a given tax year during which a property is held.

2. Average Adjusted Basis

This is the average cost basis of the property over the period during a given tax year when the property is held. The initial cost basis starts with the price paid for the property, as well as closing costs and the cost of any property improvements completed at acquisition or reasonably foreseen as necessary at the time of purchase.

The cost basis is reduced each year by the full amount of straight-line depreciation on the property. Averaging the beginning and ending cost basis values for the year provides the average adjusted basis value used for UDFI calculations.

3. Debt Financing Ratio

This is the result of dividing the average acquisition indebtedness by the average adjusted basis. This ratio is then applied to gross income produced by the property to determine the amount of UDFI.

Likewise, the same ratio is used to determine deductions for applicable expenses like interest, depreciation, and operating expenses such as property taxes, management, etc.

A $1,000 exemption against UDFI applies per taxpayer.

The net income deemed to be UDFI after the exemption and deductions is then run through the trust tax table to determine the taxable amount.

An IRA is a form of trust, thus the use of the trust table. 2019 trust tax rate brackets range from 10% on amounts below $2,550 to 37% on amounts over $12,500.

The potential of some income being taxed at a 37% rate is intimidating, and a big reason why many folks become deterred from debt-financed investments. As we continue, you’ll see that only a fraction of real income is subject to taxation, and the effective tax rate an IRA will pay is generally quite low.

UDFI – Rental Income

For sake of brevity, we’ll skip over the details of the math for determining our average adjusted basis and average acquisition indebtedness.

When we run the numbers on this deal we end up with a debt-financing ratio after the first year of .63. This means that 63% of the gross income is considered taxable as UDFI.

The property will generate $2.43M in rents, so our 1% shareholder IRA will be allocated $24,326. 63% of that value is $15,309 which is our gross UDFI income amount.

The allowable deductions include mortgage interest, depreciation, property taxes, property management, etc. The 63% allocation of these write-offs equals $15,376.
Wait, that is higher than our debt-financed income!

Due to the lower performance of the property in the initial years, we’ll have more allowable expenses than income. There will be no UDFI tax in year one even though the IRA received $7,119 of net income.

Likewise, in year two, the IRA will take home $8,719 and have no tax obligation.

The tax losses are negligible, and therefore not worth doing a return in order to carry losses forward to offset taxes in future years. This would be a viable strategy with larger tax losses.

Each year the values shift a bit and that changes the tax implications. With an interest-only loan such as this project uses, cash flow is boosted in the early years.

The trade-off with respect to UDFI is that the average acquisition indebtedness is not reduced each year by principal payments on the loan. The average adjusted basis does become lower each year as the full amount of depreciation on the property is applied.

This causes the debt-financing ratio to increase over time, making more of the income taxable. By year 10, the debt-financing ratio is .81.

In a loan normally amortized on a principal plus interest basis, the debt-financing ratio will trend consistently near the initial value until dropping in the last few years of the loan.

Following are the top line numbers for a few landmark years of the project.

  • Year 3 is the first year with tax liability.
  • Year 5 is the last year of the interest-only loan.
  • Year 7 reflects increased mortgage payments once the interest-only period expires.
  • Year 10 is the last year of the project prior to sale.
  • All values reflect the 1% share our IRA investor has in the larger deal.

Summing it Up

The impact of UDFI on the overall returns for this project is negligible. The sky is not, in fact, going to fall.

Over the 10-year period covered in the sponsor’s projections, the IRA’s $100K investment would produce $89,313 of net, after UDFI cash flow. That is an annualized ROI of 8.93%

Taxation on UDFI plus the cost of tax preparation would only reduce the overall return by an average of .58% per year.

A key income component of multi-family real estate syndications is the gain on sale.

Disclaimer: The examples provided in this article are for education purposes only and should not be construed as tax guidance. Several assumptions have been taken for simplicity of illustration such as full tax-year holdings of the property in the initial and final years. Each opportunity is unique, and many factors such as the design of a partnership can impact a participant using retirement plan funds. You should always seek qualified, licensed tax counsel when evaluating an investment using debt-financing.

Multi-family real estate syndications have been one of the hottest asset classes for savvy IRA investors for the last several years.

Participating as a limited partner in a professionally-run real estate project that is larger in scale provides many benefits. For busy professionals looking to put retirement money to work in a hands-off manner that provides a good mix of principal security and solid return potential, real estate syndications are hard to beat.

Most of these deals use a combination of investor capital and mortgage debt to acquire properties. This use of debt-financing produces exposure to tax on Unrelated Debt Financed Income (UDFI) for an IRA investor.

Queue the panic button!
Taxes will kill your IRA return!
The sky is falling!

Wrong, wrong, and, um…wrong.

Many investors and even a lot of syndicate general partners approach the topic of UDFI taxation with fear. That fear is misplaced and largely based on lack of good information.
We wanted to take a little bit of time to put this topic in proper perspective.

What is UDFI?

When an IRA uses debt-financing, it brings non-IRA money into the picture to increase the performance of the IRA’s investment. Section 514 of the tax code designates a tax on this Unrelated Debt-Financed Income.

Such taxation first became applicable in 1969, and is a means to prevent certain types of abusive transactions via tax-exempt structures.

UDFI is the portion of the income that an IRA receives based on the use of the borrowed funds. In a property with a 65% LTV loan, that would mean 65% of the gross income produced by the property is considered UDFI.

The IRA can apply the same 65% ratio of normal deductions such as depreciation, interest on the note, and operating expenses to offset the taxable income. The net taxable amount left after deductions is used to determine the tax owed by the IRA.

Taxation on UDFI applies to rental income produced by a debt-financed property. The gain on sale of a property that still has debt-financing in place is also considered to be UDFI and taxable.

At the end of the day, the IRA pays what is usually a nominal amount of tax in order to benefit from the higher cash-on-cash returns that leverage produces. The benefits of leverage will still very much be realized, just with a small amount of friction.

So, if generating higher net returns for your IRA is of interest, read on.

The Solo 401(k) Exemption

As a qualified employer retirement plan, a Solo 401(k) is exempted from UDFI when the debt-financing is used for the acquisition of real property. Other types of debt-financing, such as leveraged stock trading, are taxable as UDFI in a Solo 401(k).

In most syndicated real estate partnerships where income and losses are attributed to all limited partners equally, this exemption will still apply — even though the real estate is indirectly held and financed.

A Solo 401(k) could lose UDFI exemption if the partnership is shifting depreciation solely to investors using non-retirement funds. Such unequal allocation of losses violates the “fractions rule” of IRC section 514(c)(9)(E), and voids the qualified plan exemption to UDFI.

For those investors who are eligible for a Solo 401(k), that platform provides an advantage in terms of simplicity and higher profitability when investing in leveraged multi-family syndications.

A Sample Multi-Family Syndication

Let’s examine how UDFI impacts an IRA investor in a typical multi-family syndication.

In this project, the promoter is acquiring a 216-unit apartment complex for $25M using $10M down and a loan in the amount of $16.25M. The total acquisition cost will be $26.25M, allowing for transactional costs and capital improvements to the property.

Limited partner investors will provide $9M, and the general partner will have skin in the game by providing $1M.

The project plan is to upgrade the property and management to increase rents and occupancy rates, thereby improving the performance of the apartment. After a 10-year hold, the property will be sold, with a projected value of about $34.5M.

An IRA investor bringing $100K to this project will have a 1% equity stake as a limited partner in the LLC that will hold and operate the property.

When the investor is looking at their income and applicable taxation, everything is fractionalized to their IRA’s 1% level of ownership. So instead of this being a $25M project with $10M of investor capital down, it essentially becomes a $250K project with the IRA investor’s $100K down.

The promoter’s pro-forma projections for cash flow indicate that a 1% limited partner can expect a distribution from the LLC annually. The following amounts exhibit the increase over time as property performance increases.

  • Year 1: $7,119
  • Year 5: $10,769
  • Year 10 $11,395

At the end of the 10-year hold when the property sells, the investor should receive their capital back, plus their percentage of the gain on sale. Our $100K investor with 1% participation could expect around $92K in proceeds from the future sale if the $34.5M goal is met.

UDFI Calculation

When examining UDFI, there are 3 key values used:

1. Average Acquisition Indebtedness

This is the average monthly balance on the loan during that portion of a given tax year during which a property is held.

2. Average Adjusted Basis

This is the average cost basis of the property over the period during a given tax year when the property is held. The initial cost basis starts with the price paid for the property, as well as closing costs and the cost of any property improvements completed at acquisition or reasonably foreseen as necessary at the time of purchase.

The cost basis is reduced each year by the full amount of straight-line depreciation on the property. Averaging the beginning and ending cost basis values for the year provides the average adjusted basis value used for UDFI calculations.

3. Debt Financing Ratio

This is the result of dividing the average acquisition indebtedness by the average adjusted basis. This ratio is then applied to gross income produced by the property to determine the amount of UDFI.

Likewise, the same ratio is used to determine deductions for applicable expenses like interest, depreciation, and operating expenses such as property taxes, management, etc.

A $1,000 exemption against UDFI applies per taxpayer.

The net income deemed to be UDFI after the exemption and deductions is then run through the trust tax table to determine the taxable amount.

An IRA is a form of trust, thus the use of the trust table. 2019 trust tax rate brackets range from 10% on amounts below $2,550 to 37% on amounts over $12,500.

The potential of some income being taxed at a 37% rate is intimidating, and a big reason why many folks become deterred from debt-financed investments. As we continue, you’ll see that only a fraction of real income is subject to taxation, and the effective tax rate an IRA will pay is generally quite low.

UDFI – Rental Income

For sake of brevity, we’ll skip over the details of the math for determining our average adjusted basis and average acquisition indebtedness.

When we run the numbers on this deal we end up with a debt-financing ratio after the first year of .63. This means that 63% of the gross income is considered taxable as UDFI.

The property will generate $2.43M in rents, so our 1% shareholder IRA will be allocated $24,326. 63% of that value is $15,309 which is our gross UDFI income amount.

The allowable deductions include mortgage interest, depreciation, property taxes, property management, etc. The 63% allocation of these write-offs equals $15,376.
Wait, that is higher than our debt-financed income!

Due to the lower performance of the property in the initial years, we’ll have more allowable expenses than income. There will be no UDFI tax in year one even though the IRA received $7,119 of net income.

Likewise, in year two, the IRA will take home $8,719 and have no tax obligation.

The tax losses are negligible, and therefore not worth doing a return in order to carry losses forward to offset taxes in future years. This would be a viable strategy with larger tax losses.

Each year the values shift a bit and that changes the tax implications. With an interest-only loan such as this project uses, cash flow is boosted in the early years.

The trade-off with respect to UDFI is that the average acquisition indebtedness is not reduced each year by principal payments on the loan. The average adjusted basis does become lower each year as the full amount of depreciation on the property is applied.

This causes the debt-financing ratio to increase over time, making more of the income taxable. By year 10, the debt-financing ratio is .81.

In a loan normally amortized on a principal plus interest basis, the debt-financing ratio will trend consistently near the initial value until dropping in the last few years of the loan.

Following are the top line numbers for a few landmark years of the project.

  • Year 3 is the first year with tax liability.
  • Year 5 is the last year of the interest-only loan.
  • Year 7 reflects increased mortgage payments once the interest-only period expires.
  • Year 10 is the last year of the project prior to sale.
  • All values reflect the 1% share our IRA investor has in the larger deal.

Summing it Up

The impact of UDFI on the overall returns for this project is negligible. The sky is not, in fact, going to fall.

Over the 10-year period covered in the sponsor’s projections, the IRA’s $100K investment would produce $89,313 of net, after UDFI cash flow. That is an annualized ROI of 8.93%

Taxation on UDFI plus the cost of tax preparation would only reduce the overall return by an average of .58% per year.

A key income component of multi-family real estate syndications is the gain on sale.

Disclaimer: The examples provided in this article are for education purposes only and should not be construed as tax guidance. Several assumptions have been taken for simplicity of illustration such as full tax-year holdings of the property in the initial and final years. Each opportunity is unique, and many factors such as the design of a partnership can impact a participant using retirement plan funds. You should always seek qualified, licensed tax counsel when evaluating an investment using debt-financing.

Heading

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Heading

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Resources

Explore more resources

View All Resources

Why You Need Your Retirement Plan in Place Before Investing

Blog
continue reading

Why IRA Real Estate Investors Need Checkbook Control

Blog
continue reading

Why Flip Lending is a Great Option in 2021

Blog
continue reading
Video

SoloK Basics

Self-Employed and want to learn about retirement options? The Solo 401 (K) might be right for you. Watch this video to learn more!
continue reading
Video

Self-Directed IRA Basics

Interested in investing your retirement in alternative assets? Learn all about Self-Directed IRA's and break free from Wall Street today!
continue reading
Video

Real Estate in Your IRA

Think retirement can only be invested in stocks and bonds? Think again. Many people are now investing their IRA's in Real Estate and breaking free from Wall Street. Learn how today.
continue reading
Podcasts

Episode 1: Safeguard Advisors Overview

Welcome to Unlocking Your Retirement, the podcast where we dive deep into the world of self-directed retirement investing. In this series, we explore the tools, strategies, and opportunities available to investors seeking greater control over their retirement funds.
continue reading
TESTIMONIALS

What our clients says about us

Worked with Safeguard to set up a self-directed IRA. VERY helpful and thorough through the whole process. Appreciated the professionalism and knowledge as we talked about the many questions we had. Would highly recommend Safeguard as a place to do business!
Bruce B.
– Fishers, Indiana
I got a lot of important information about the industry and the benefits of going with a Company like Safeguard Advisors. I liked the reduced expenses and the freedom to have more control over the process. Ultimately it was the professionalism, thoughtfulness and care exhibited by all the employees involved in the onboarding process. I look forward to having the resources available to me with my investments and highly recommended this service.
Jeff M.
– Corona, California
Thank you for helping me setup my SDIRA. I knew establishing one was the best thing I could do to accelerate my retirement portfolio. You gave me the confidence to pull the trigger knowing I had the right team working for me!
Todd L.
– San Jose, California
I set up my plan for a Self-Directed IRA with Safeguard and am very happy with the service I received. They were very helpful at every turn and always there to help if needed. My advisor explained things so even the most unfamiliar customer could understand the plan and process with ease. I would recommend this company very highly. I think they are a very professional outfit and truly do have the best interest of their clients in mind.
Lief J.
– Lakewood, Colorado
I can’t explain how excited I am regarding this investment strategy. I’ll be 50 in a few months, and a year ago my idea of planning for retirement had many “what ifs”. This has opened the door to a better path of retirement planning on the investment side than I have ever seen. By the way, I have a Bachelor’s degree in finance with an emphasis in investment. They never taught this.
Doug R.
– St. Louis, Missouri
Safeguard is great! Highly recommend them. Very efficient and knowledgeable. Excellent customer service. Answered all my questions quickly and expertly.
Lance R.
- Fulshear, Texas
Safeguard Advisors provided excellent service and an excellent product. They were prompt, courteous, knowledgeable, and professional in all points of contact. I highly recommend them if you are considering a checkbook IRA.
Cheryl N.
- Lexington, Virginia
I set up a self directed IRA with Safeguard and the entire process could not have been easier. They guided me every step of the way and were always available to answer any questions I had. I highly recommend Safeguard!
Allan E.
- Bristol, Wisconsin
"It has been a pleasure working with Safeguard Advisors. They have been prompt, professional, courteous, informative and spot on regarding the setup of my Checkbook IRA. Follow up communications have been quick and extremely helpful. I can’t recommend Safeguard Advisors highly enough."
Jeff R.
- Birmingham, Alabama
" As usual, even greater concentration of pertinent info than I hoped for. Much appreciated and very helpful."
David M.
- Longwood, Florida
" Thanks. I love working with people who do what they say they are going to do!"
David H.
- Ormond Beach, Florida
It took me 2 years to make the plunge and get started with a self-directed IRA, but Safeguard made it easy! I was rolled over and invested in an apartment complex in less than a month even while I was overseas.
Joshua L.
- Eagle River, Alaska
" You assisted me with setting up a self-directed IRA in early 2019. I know I mentioned it at the time, but I still think it was one of the most positive professional experiences I’ve ever had. Everything was very well-organized and you and your team were incredibly responsive! "
Andrew M.
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
" I want to thank you for your support, help and guidance in this endeavor. I invested $400,000 in purchasing rental properties. Over the years I collected around $600,000 in rent and then sold the properties for $1.5 million. I just wanted to share my success story and thank you for your help. "
Ron M.
- San Diego, California
FAQ

Quick answers to common questions

General
Compliance
Mechanics
How Do I Get Started?

We’ll take you through a simple, step by step process designed to put your investment future into your own hands…immediately. Everything is handled on a turn-key basis. You take 100% control of your Retirement funds legally and without a taxable distribution.

Is It Legal to Invest Retirement Funds into Alternative Assets Like Real Estate?

YES! In 1974, Congress passed the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) making IRA, 401(k) and other retirement plans possible. Only two types of investments are excluded under ERISA and IRS Codes: Life Insurance Contracts and Collectibles (art, jewelry, etc.). Everything else is fair game. IRS CodeSec. 401 IRC 408(a) (3)

Why Haven’t I Heard About This?

It’s actually pretty simple. Early on, regulators let the securities industry take the lead in educating the public about retirement accounts. Naturally, brokers and banks promoted stocks, bonds, and mutual funds—giving the impression that those were the only allowed investments. That was never true... and still isn’t. You can probably guess why they kept the rest under wraps.

What types of retirement accounts am I able to use?

It is possible to use funds from most types of retirement accounts:

  • Traditional IRA
  • Roth IRA
  • SEP IRA
  • SIMPLE IRA
  • Keogh
  • 401(k)
  • 403(b)
  • Profit Sharing Plans
  • Qualified Annuities
  • Money Purchase Plans
  • and many more.

It must be noted that most employer sponsored plans such as a 401(k) will not allow you to roll youraccount into a new Self-Directed IRA plan while you are still employed. However, some employers will allow you to roll a portion of your funds. The only way to be completely sure whether your funds are eligible for a rollover is by contacting your current 401(k) provider.

Do I Qualify for a Solo 401(k)?

A Solo 401(k) requires a sponsoring employer in the format of an owner-only business. If you have a for-profit business activity – whether as your main income or as a side venture – and have no full-time employees other than potentially your spouse, your business may qualify. The business may be a sole-proprietorship, LLC, corporation or other entity type.

What is a self-directed Retirement Plan?

A self-directed retirement plan is a type of IRA or 401(k) that gives you greater control over how your retirement funds are invested. Unlike traditional accounts held at banks or brokerage firms that limit you to stocks, bonds, and mutual funds, self-directed plans allow you to invest in a wide range of alternative assets including real estate, private businesses, precious metals, cryptocurrency, and more.

These plans still follow the same IRS rules and maintain the same tax-deferred or tax-free benefits as conventional retirement accounts. The difference is simply in how and where you choose to invest.

Are There Taxes for Converting to a Self-Directed Plan?

No. Moving to a self-directed IRA or Solo 401(k) does not trigger any taxes, as long as your funds are eligible for rollover.

Self-directed retirement plans maintain the same tax-advantaged status as traditional plans offered by banks or brokerage firms. The key difference is flexibility—our plans are designed to give you greater control and allow for a wider range of alternative investments beyond stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.

Specifically, what are prohibited transactions?

A prohibited transaction is any action between your retirement plan and a disqualified person that violates IRS rules and can lead to serious tax consequences. Under IRS Code 4975(c)(1), prohibited transactions include:

  • Selling or leasing property between your plan and a disqualified person Example: Your IRA cannot purchase a property you already own.
  • Lending money or extending credit between the plan and a disqualified person Example: You cannot personally guarantee a loan your IRA uses to buy real estate.
  • Providing goods or services between your plan and a disqualified person Example: You can’t use your personal furniture to furnish a rental property owned by your IRA.
  • Using plan income or assets for the benefit of a disqualified person Example: Your IRA cannot buy a vacation home that you or your family use.
  • Self-dealing by a fiduciary (using plan assets for their own benefit) Example: Your CPA shouldn't loan your IRA money if they’re advising the plan.
  • Receiving personal benefit from a deal involving your IRA's assets Example: You can’t pay yourself from profits your IRA earns on a rental.

If a transaction doesn’t clearly fall within the allowed guidelines, the IRS or Department of Labor may review the situation to determine if it qualifies as a prohibited transaction.

Who are Disqualified Persons?

Disqualified persons are individuals or entities that are prohibited from engaging in certain transactions with your IRA or 401(k). Doing so could trigger a prohibited transaction, which may result in taxes and penalties.

Here’s who is considered a disqualified person:

  • You (the account holder)
  • Your spouse
  • Your parents, grandparents, and other ancestors
  • Your children, grandchildren, and their spouses
  • Any advisor or fiduciary to the plan
  • Any business or entity owned 50% or more by you or another disqualified person, or where you have decision-making authority

These rules exist to prevent self-dealing and ensure your retirement plan remains in compliance with IRS regulations.
(Reference: IRC 4975)

How do I make sure I am following the rules?

Understanding and following these rules can be tricky, but it’s very doable. The best way to stay compliant is to work with professionals who specialize in self-directed retirement plans. They can help you navigate IRS guidelines and avoid prohibited transactions.

What are the consequences of a prohibited transaction?

If an IRA holder is found to have engaged in a prohibited transaction with IRA funds, it will result in a distribution of the IRA. The taxes and penalties are severe and are applicable to all of the IRA’s assets on the first day of the year in which the prohibited transaction occurred.

Are there limits to the investments I can make?

Yes. While self-directed retirement plans allow for a wide range of investments, there are a few important restrictions.

You cannot invest in collectibles or life insurance contracts, and you must avoid prohibited transactions—activities that benefit you personally rather than the retirement plan. These include things like buying or selling property to yourself or family members, using plan assets for personal gain, or self-dealing in any way.

Violating these rules could cause your entire IRA to lose its tax-advantaged status. To protect your account, it’s essential to work with professionals who understand IRS regulations and can help you stay compliant.

My CPA or Financial Advisor says this is illegal. Why?

This is a common misconception. In many cases, professionals may simply be unfamiliar with self-directed retirement plans, as they fall outside their usual scope of work. CPAs and tax preparers are trained to file taxes, not necessarily to advise on alternative retirement strategies. Financial advisors and brokers often work for firms that focus on traditional investments like stocks and mutual funds—and may not benefit from or support alternative options like real estate or private lending.

Self-directed retirement investing is legal under IRS rules—but like any specialized area, it requires working with professionals who understand how it works.

Why are these rules considered to be complex?

The IRS has rules in place to make sure your IRA is used only for the exclusive benefit of the retirement account—not for personal gain or to help family members. These rules can get complicated because there are many ways a conflict of interest can occur, even unintentionally.

For example, if your IRA buys a house and rents it to your mother, you might be reluctant to evict her if she stops paying rent. That emotional connection creates a conflict between what’s best for your IRA and your personal relationships, something the IRS aims to prevent.

These rules help ensure your retirement account stays compliant and protected. (See IRC 408)

Get started to empower your financial future with self-directed investing

Unlock your investment potential with our self-directed retirement plans tailored just for you.
get started